Monday, May 30, 2011

"Sticky" LDL

The Internet is awash with stories announcing the discovery of a new "sticky" LDL (low-density lipoprotein) molecule that is much more deadly than the regular LDL. This new LDL is called MGmin-LDL.

Most of the stories simply reprint the press release used by Science Daily and EurekAlert and other popular science-news alerting services. These tell you that the new form of LDL is glycated and it turns LDL into small, dense LDL, the kind that is more easily taken up by the arterial wall to form plaque.

Interestingly, metformin seems to block the formation of MGmin-LDL.

But what exactly is MGmin-LDL?

The MG stands for methylglyoxal, which is a highly reactive side product of glycolysis (the aerobic metabolism of glucose). MG reacts with proteins and is one way cells produce AGEs, or advanced glycation end products, which are glycated proteins that cause a lot of the side effects associated with diabetes.

MG is known to cause AGEs in a lot of proteins, including enzymes and DNA transcription factors, and has even been implicated as a cause of insulin resistance. MG has also been used as a marker of oxidative stress. We know that glycated proteins are not effective. Glycation of serum albumin (not necessarily by MG) seems to decrease insulin secretion. Glycation of LDL reduces its uptake by the LDL receptor. And so forth.


The higher your blood glucose (BG) levels, the more MG you make and the more glycation of protein occurs. One study showed that MG levels reflected the level of postprandial BG levels and suggested that high postprandial levels are as important as hemoglobin A1c levels when it comes to causing complications.

In fact, the idea that MG reacts with LDL is not new. It was shown in 1998, and possible even earlier, that MG reacts with LDL. However, each new research project adds new information, and the current one emphasized the atherogenicity of the MG-LDL complex.

The
min in the MGmin-LDL stands for minimally modified, meaning that they didn't carry out the reactions to such an extent that the product was not physiological. They modified it so that it was present in concentrations they thought would actually occur in a human.

It's interesting that the popular, and generic, drug metformin reduces the level of MGmin-LDL. It may do this by blocking the formation of MG.

Because MG is formed as a byproduct of glycolysis, the more glucose that goes through the glycolytic pathway, the more MG you'll be apt to make. But glucose not only source of MG. Other compounds, including ketones, can also be broken down into MG.

Hence, just to be on the safe side, the best way to reduce the levels of MG might be simply to eat less food of all kinds. But we have to eat something, so eating less of the glucose-forming foods would most likely be the most effective in reducing the levels of MG. We know that high BG levels increase glycation of all kinds of proteins, as illustrated above, whether through MG or other mechanisms. Some of these proteins are needed to keep our bodies in top working order. Glycating them means they can't do their job.

It's hard to give up the carby foods we love. But to me, it doesn't make sense to risk getting complications just for the temporary pleasure of eating rice or toast and jam.



7 comments:

  1. Interesting. I wonder how this compares to vLDL, which was also one of the bad cholesterols, levels of which are raised by polyunsaturated fats and sugars in the diet.

    I've been surprised recently on how many top low-carb advocates have no relaxed their stance on low carb and hae been more in favor of a higher carb lower fat diet now.
    http://donmatesz.blogspot.com/2011/06/fat-balance-versus-energy-balance.html

    when fat is in the blood with glucose, it seems to be causing more problems and higher BG and IR than glucose alone. This is probably why lower-fat diabetes diets tend to work, like Dean Ornish's diet and also I can't recall any names right now but I wonder what you think about that?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Avishek, As far as I know, Don isn't diabetic, so he can eat more carbs.

    You need to try LC or low-fat diets and see what gives you the best BG control. What I don't like about LF diets is that

    1. On such a diet, I was constantly ravenously hungry. Eating more fat cured the hunger problem.

    2. Let's say you're on a LF diet, you've finished the alloted food for dinner, and you're still hungry. What do you do?

    Can't eat more fat because you've had your fat allotment. Can't eat more meat because meat contains fat. Can't eat more carbs because they'll make BG go up.

    So you spend the next 5 or 6 hours thinking about food as you wait for the next meal. Who wants to live like that?

    With a LC diet, if you're still hungry, you can have a little more meat or something like cheese.

    If he's still hungry, Don can eat more carbs. We can't unless we want high BGs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ok you're speaking for diabetics, I see. I think gene analyses could solve all of these arguments. I personally attest to what you are saying, fat curbs hunger, eating carbohydrates promotes hunger for more carbohydrates. What's interesitng still is the study in that blog post, corroborated by anecdotes of people on the 80-10-10 diet, or vegan diets high in carbohydrates, by people who do not gain weight.

    I wonder if there is a genetic difference that allows some diabetics to respond to low-fat diets, and some to low-carb.

    Also, another anecdote, if I eat a high carb/high fat meal together, I just pass out, i think this is just some form of acute insulin resistance or something.

    So you are diabetic? And you follow a LC diet, has that helped you with your bg control? I think there may also be a degree of adaptation to a low fat diet that in the long term can improve insulin signaling in those who have poor insulin signaling from following a low-carb diet for an extended period of time

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Avishek, This is a diabetes list (see the blog header). That doesn't mean nondiabetics can't read it, of course. But my general statements refer to people with diabetes, especially type 2.

    I was on a low-fat diet for almost a year, and it didn't control my BG.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You are so cool! I do not suppose I've truly read a single thing like that before.
    So nice to find somebody with some unique thoughts on this subject matter.
    Seriously.. thank you for starting this up. This web site () is
    one thing that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality!

    ReplyDelete